Rezzable: On Builderbot again

RightasRain was at Treet studios this morning recording an episode of Designing Worlds regarding Rezzable and Builderbot‘s upcoming release next week. (Of course, after Rezzable has packed up their stuff in Second Life)

What you will hear at the studio, but may not hear at the final cut of the show, was what RaR said afterward.

From the official Treat Studios release about the show:
And RightasRain Rezzable will be in the studio to discuss how the issue will affect not just Second Life, but Open Sim grids as well, in the light of the BuilderBot tool.

So do join us at the Designing Worlds studios on Northpoint as we discuss this hugely important issue for Virtual Worlds – and make your voice heard. The show starts at 2pm, but we recommend being there at 1:30pm to make sure of getting a seat.

Ah, that’s the fun thing about television shows, in the physical world and second life – after the cameras turn off, everything that happens afterward is pure hearsay. There are no transcripts.

RightAsRain was overheard saying that as long as you don’t resell something you download, that’s okay. That’s his version of intellectual property. RaR has contracts with his builders that assign their IP rights to HIM – and he has obviously forgotten that outside of his organizations, that rule does not apply. He also believes if you change the item by 10%, you can claim it as your own. (ARRRRGGGHHHH!!!) RaR also claimed he was releasing BuilderBot to assist builders – when in reality, he’s making his last pennies out of Second Life.

It would also appear that RaR claims that he is right in releasing this, and anyone who disagrees is “emotional” and “haters”. (Yes, from what I understand, he actually said those things.)

Despite the lack of full chat log of what RightasRain was saying, I do have some chat-logged responses:

[14:57]  Leyla Firefly gets her bag with rotten tomatoes
[14:58]  Leyla Firefly: next week he will
[14:58]  Leyla Firefly: 100 usd
[14:58]  Guu Nishi: pass me some of those
[14:58]  Leyla Firefly: this is a pay back! say the truth!
[14:58]  Inbred Texan: so it doesn’t really concern you if people get things stolen cause you’ve said if people really wanted to create they’d build for xbox

[14:58]  Inbred Texan: and your dancing around questions and issues
[14:58]  Inbred Texan: ya prat
[14:58]  Inbred Texan: black and white
[14:58]  Inbred Texan: your a prick

[14:59]  Maxwell Graf: The issue become not only who can benefit from this in both use and profit, but more importnatly, who will be damaged the most from it.

[14:59]  Cierra Anatine: what would you do if someone copied your product and sold it?

[15:00]  Inbred Texan: lol they would make a tool that allows others to do it too apparently.

[15:00]  Thomus Keen: any tool with the potential to be used inappropriately, will.

[15:01]  Melchizedek Blauvelt: all I can think of after this is “how about no content creation for a while”

[15:05]  Inbred Texan: well when you sit there on a panel inside a game and basically say that if people really want to create they’d go learn something else
[15:05]  Darleez DeCuir: Thank you everyone for joining us!
[15:06]  Inbred Texan: thats a load of crap and pretty rude
[15:06]  Leyla Firefly is sad jerry Springer scenarios are not possible in SL. Visions herself running around with RightasRain’s inner noob shed to pieces.

[15:06]  Saffia Widdershins: Thank you everyone for coming!
[15:06]  Inbred Texan: and basically shows his views on content creation
[15:06]  Inbred Texan: the personality is pretty clear
[15:06]  Luna Cartier: lol!

[15:22]  Melchizedek Blauvelt: I’ll just use your Greenies sim without selling it?

[15:25]  Inbred Texan: hes mentioned specifically if people didn’t want their stuff stolen then they would learn to build else where, or for xbox… There is a mentality there that is just morally wrong and is disrespectful to anyone who creates in SL

[15:25]  Inbred Texan: or anywhere for that matter. its saying if you were really a good creator you would have a real job

[15:25]  Inbred Texan: thats the mentality I’m seeing.

[15:25]  Leyla Firefly: so because i have a rl job it’s ok to steal my stuff here?
[15:25]  Inbred Texan: I’m better so it doesn’t matter if your stuff gets stolen, I’m gonna sell the builder bot cause its about “me” making money
[15:26]  Inbred Texan: basically what it sounds like leyla
[15:26]  Melchizedek Blauvelt: I’m on the same line Inbred

[15:26]  Leyla Firefly: i rather rip their eyes out

[15:26]  Inbred Texan: i think everyone is on the same line that has heard him speak

[15:26]  Inbred Texan: this isn’t an emotional response (From Tenshi: I am assuming this is where RaR called people who don’t like Builderbot “Emotional”.)

[15:26]  Inbred Texan: this is about how people treat people. and whats right and whats wrong.

[15:27]  Leyla Firefly: when i bump into an exact sofa i made with another creator on it i feel virtualy raped
[15:27]  Inbred Texan: so what this seems to me is a revenge type thing based on emotion as he says. your stuff got stolen and there was nothing you could do.. so now you want to make a point to everyone else.
[15:27]  Inbred Texan: ?
[15:27]  BETLOG Hax: /as i see it this all comes down to every grid needing to have the ability to transfer tags of creator/grid of origin… including being able to inspect textures and contents of objects for the same data… so builderbot could add that i’m sure, but its the grids that dont support that. … and i agree the emotional response needs to be moderated… its important.. but we are attacking RAR for a limitation in the various grids (and the fact he may release builderbot before thats been adequately handled… but should he wait for the grids to manage that issue?)
[15:27]  Kriss Lehmann: I think he was pointing out that theft can not be stopped in SL, and is easy, but it’s much harder to steal content from a closed system like xbox
[15:28]  Leyla Firefly: lots!
[15:28]  Maxwell Graf: It’s easy enough to take some kind of intellectually objective stance on this when you are, in all likelyhood, not going to be effected negatively from it all. You release a monster on the grid here, while safely distant from the consequences. There is no accountability for your actions!
[15:31]  BETLOG Hax: i have a notecard full of prominent builders prims, full perms.. including my own. The primary function of this notecard seems to be to allow people with suitably equipped viewers/scripts to recreate your objects.. using your prims.. making it indiscernable from the original except by permissions

RightAsRain Rezzable is rumored to be meeting with Linden Lab again shortly before the release of Builderbot, possibly to prevent Linden Lab from creating code against Builderbot, or some other possibly unknown motive other than gloating.

[15:13]  Klyks Klees: Would one of you be able to address where we currently stand with Builderbot and scripted objects and what we might expect to see in the future?
Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Advertising

Comments

  1. Twisted Vendetta says:

    If they have any ethics whatsoever, at the very least, they will release weekly a list of anyone who has purchased it, so that sim owners can ban those people to protect themselves from being stolen from.

  2. Ann Otoole says:

    What is necessary cannot be said.

  3. This is Rezzable… Ethics?

  4. Inbred Texan says:

    His comments were on voice but it was pretty obvious from the beginning the amount of respect he had for people in SL. He wore a noob spammer, that made comments every few seconds like “how do I start a store.” “wow I really like your outfit where can I get it.”

    I’m sure it was a novelty but pretty much set the groundwork for how seriously he takes these issues. He apparently finally removed it.

    His comments that summed it up for me was a couple things.

    1. If you don’t want your things stolen don’t play SL, and go learn maya and work for xbox.

    2. He had all his things stolen before and was paying LL too much and not getting any satisfaction so he decided to leave SL.

    3. He has a right to his intellectual property rights and taking his stuff out of game (regardless of the TOS he signed.)

    there are several other points he attempted to make but.. LL didn’t take his IP. It should all still be on his HD if hes the creator. He also doesn’t seem to think anyone in SL can create anything and he seems to think its all just a bunch of wannabies. His comments were very pompous and I honestly feel bad for the people who created for him, and him taking all the credit.

  5. These comments only cement the things I’d heard previously… Personally, I was never sad to see the back of Rezzable in SL and having heard these comments made, I’m even happier that they’re leaving.

    I’d love to know what LL *really* think about all of this

  6. admin says:

    Wow. Inbred… I don’t know what to say. But thank you for attending and saying most of the things all of us were thinking.

  7. Shamrawk says:

    Say goodbye to the SL that we all know and love. Seriously I don’t know why LL is allowing this. Its pretty much the Godzilla of copybots, right? (I’m only about 5 mins into the vid, and am already tired of hearing his voice)

  8. Emma Gilmour says:

    This is so upsetting to me :( … I don’t know what to say.. there are so many things wrong with what this person is doing and how they are viewing the SL community. Just.. :(

  9. Kyria Tomsen says:

    Wow. That’s lovely… So, attention store owners! We will no longer be buying your products that you build, texture, rebuild, destroy, cry over, and rebuild! We’ll copy them..but don’t worry! It’s all good…we won’t sell them to somebody else and run you out of business. We’re just going to copy them and give them to our friends, and make copies for ourselves…maybe some of those noobs over there… It’s not stealing! It’s “Creative Attainment”. Totally legal.

  10. Raven Haalan says:

    I don’t have anything to add to:

    http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=3468

    and

    http://www.ravenhaalan.com/?p=43

    The sad drama will play out, and we’ll see if LL reacts quickly enough.

  11. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    @inbred re #2

    Ok so his whiny ass got stolen from and he’s pissed at LL so decides to release something that could eventually fuck LL, and all if us, over?

    What a little bitch

  12. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    Can someone explain to me who rightasrain is exactly?

    I thought the person behind rezzable was that starax guys alt?

    And didn’t they just buy a bunch of sims and pay ppl to build content for it?

    Someone from rez approached me about a year ago asking if I’d create them a surf line and give to them full perm. They offered to pay me 30 usd for this. I laughed and said no, a more reasonable offer would be 300usd and even that was lowball. She then called my products crap and a bunch of other snide remarks

    I never liked them much after that

  13. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Builderbot… your one time payment unlimited SL credit card…

  14. Tyr Rozenblum says:

    This is terrible but I think it’ll go the way of copy bot. It’ll be a big scare, it will steal from people and then linden will mess with it a bit. But…there is so much out there that is currently ripping off people in a big way..that hasnt been stopped. What makes this different? really? Ill always build faster than they can keep up. And if anything it’ll drive me to keep going. People like that are worthless and vindictive and feel personally scorned. It doesnt seem like its against us, so much as to prove a point to linden lab.

    So..

    Dear Linden Lab,
    Please give us legal rights to our items, let us pay for licenses, take us from “intellectual art” to artists who get new cars when people rip us off.

    Thank you,
    Tyr.

    Tyr

  15. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Blahblahblahwhatever wrote “Can someone explain to me who rightasrain is exactly?

    I thought the person behind rezzable was that starax guys alt?”

    No, Starax only builds on the Rezzable sims. Starax is one of those creators who love building and gives many of his creations away for free. Then RightasRain came along to SL, and thought of a ‘great’ business idea – he was going to exploit all the SL builders who made things for love and not money, give them a place to display and build things (really kind of him, right?). His idea was to create high traffic sims, that he could use to generate money from advertising etc. That didn’t work so he made the creators of his sims make stores and all the profit from those stores went directly to him, but that profit was enough, he wanted more, and he offered to sell the Rezzable sims to Linden Labs for a ridiculous amount of money, to which they refused, and you can work the rest of the story out from there.

  16. moo Money says:

    I was doing some raw footage work for Linden Lab where I was to highlight 5 sims that represented the grid at the time, which was September 2007. We ended up going with Dublin, Tableau, Straylight, Weather Island, and Svarga.

    However, I’d originally suggested Greenies. Since I needed permission from the owners to film on their land, I paid to make the call from the US to Rezzable’s UK office. They never contacted me in any way even though I left a voicemail saying the many ways they could reach me.

    Human decency. They don’t have any respect for anyone but themselves. That was a project for *Linden Lab* which would have gotten them news coverage in the process, but noooooo. I hope someone uses Builder Bot on their little King Tut grid and puts it on MG to flaunt it.

  17. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    Thanks biyb

    Prob some little twat irl who has some need to try and execute fear and power over ppl in sl cus he sucks irl. Poor. Thing

  18. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Blahblahblahwhatever wrote “Prob some little twat irl who has some need to try and execute fear and power over ppl in sl cus he sucks irl. Poor. Thing”

    You know, high school gunman springs to mind – Don’t underestimate what a mentally messed up human being can do and affect the rest of us just because they felt that ‘society let them down’. As the saying goes… always take responsibility for your actions, but some people seem to be incapable of doing that and want to blame and therefore hurt others.

  19. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    @ byib

    No I agree with you on that post for sure

    That’s exactly what this reminds me of

    A hopped over to the rezzable site where there’s a discussion going on about this and RaRs responses ate quite frightening. He gets called out then tries to calm everyone by saying things like ” let’s all be calm and think positive thoughts ” … Sheesh reminds me of jim jones or lucifer trying to become god

    He also states ge has no idea if there are other business with multiple sim builds that need backup but he feels releasing it will do more good than harm for content creators – wow. No. If it’s not apparently obvious there are many other multiple sim built business in need of an import export software then there prob isn’t. And therefore the main people who will get this are people who want to be malicious

    Personally I just don’t pay much mind to this. I guess I’m just going to wait and hopefully I’m not reminded by news of peoples sims being uploaded elsewhere

  20. rightasrain says:

    Tenshi–citing hearsay and publishing chat logs, even for you this is a new low.

  21. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Blahblahblahwhatever, this RaR guy has become an idol for every script kiddie/ thief/ RL dropout on the grid. It’s frightening how a sociopath can gain such a huge following, like you say, he really thinks he is god! How misguided!… reminds me of the Manson family in some ways…

  22. admin says:

    Hey RightAsRain! Welcome to SCD, I see it’s your first time here. Why don’t you clarify things for us?

  23. Heidi Halberstadt says:

    He can’t hear you over the sound of how awesome he is.

  24. Heidi Halberstadt says:

    LOL @ admin

  25. admin says:

    Also, the fun thing about hearsay… is when more than one person hears it… suddenly it has truth weight. :) You said all that at a show filming. How’s that backpedaling going for you, sir?

  26. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Tenshi, I wouldn’t mess with this RaR guy, he sounds like he keeps a collection of guns, and nazi paraphernalia in his mom’s basement where he lives.

  27. admin says:

    HAH

  28. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Oh yeah, I forgot to add: most of RaR’s supporters/ fanbois are RL unemployed moochers and have never worked a day in their lives, that’s why they depend on the release of the Builderbot to make their SL lives a little bit more easier… FREE stuff for everyone! What a hero this guy is.

  29. Ohhh, so now it’s hearsay.

    RaR, I was quite impressed with sims like Greenies and other Rezzable sims when Rezzable first began. I made sure that the M2 gave them good coverage.

    Then it turns out that you simply were taking advantage of great builders like the former Starax/Light Waves and suddenly you’re trying to put a coin slot on art. Nothing wrong with trying to make a living — some museums charge admission fees. I have no quibble with that.

    What I do have a problem with is the way you USE people, and then when things don’t work out financially for you, pack up shop like a snake oil salesman off to hit the next bunch of suckers.

    And now there’s BuilderBot. Any other businessman — and I use the term VERY loosely — would listen to public opinion. But you seem bound and determined to loose something on SL and related worlds that you KNOW people will misuse and will result in content theft, and you apparently don’t give a fuck.

    I hope to be around when this bites you on your sorry ass.

    P2

  30. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Phoenix Psaltery wrote “What I do have a problem with is the way you USE people, and then when things don’t work out financially for you, pack up shop like a snake oil salesman off to hit the next bunch of suckers.”

    Kinda like Eric Bauman, the guy who made a small fortune by stealing content from the internet and reposting it on his website with his eBaum’s World logo on it. Maybe they are related in RL?

  31. RightasRain has for a huge period of his SL existence been a pet resident. Due to undemocratic managing Linden Lab has in the past given sims FREE or for lower prices fees to those residents. About one year ago with changes in management they started the clean up, which means from now on they also have to pay a fee.
    Rezzable was one of those projects.
    RightasRain refuses to pay like all of us and sold his sims. The Builderbot is the payback, he is reacting like a scorned lover.
    Will he hurt Linden Lab with this?
    Not directly, he proves now what a dumb ass he is.
    The talking with Linden Lab is about the license he needs to be able to sell this Builderbot, he CAN’T sell it without.
    Those licenses cost a fair amount of money.

    He claims an english rl identity on his website, yet when you hear him in voice, no english accent at all.

    The way he claimed in voice being the thinker of the awesome designs of Starax is just vulgar, if he ever felt the passion of creating something he would NEVER create a tool to steal other people’s designs.

    Once again, another internet ego sitting in his underwear in his grandma’s cellar, no life, nothing to lose.

  32. BETLOG Hax says:

    I am disappointed that this chatlog paste is also incomplete. I hope it wasn’t terminated at that point for shock effect.

    In retrospect I’m also a little surprised that there isn’t a standard agreement with this kind of broadcast event where people accept that chatlogs will be collated *with transcription of the voice discussion* for unified publishing.
    IMO this is essential before those who were not there, or who were there and want to review, can armchair-criticise in forum like this.

    However the thing I really wasn’t expecting was the very prominent iceberg tip of mob emotion, and personal attacks from the same people who probably use second inventory, and will almost certainly need a tool like builderbot to export their sim builds if/when they decide to move into another metaverse because of some supposedly better content protection, or plans to insure the survival of their commercial interests through diversification.
    Just because the origins of these tools are often initially used illegitimately shouldn’t mean we forget that they are also adaptable to become legitimate tools, and that their inception is almost always thanks to those persons who’s musings occupy a grey area between the ethical and the uncaringly curious.
    Often such people have ethics of the highest order, yet the very nature of exploring the territory that fascinates them, and ultimately benefits us all means they fraternize and collaborate with the dark yet genius underbelly of the ethically dubious.
    Tools like Second Inventory and Builder Bot have such origins.
    Script kiddies, theft cartels, copybots and the stuff that strikes fear and hate into the hearts of commercial creators in the legal wild-west that is Metaverse commerce and Digital Rights Management at this time, are the same people that initially drive their discovery and subsequent rectification.
    It’s only when such origins can be taken into the light of day by the entrepreneurial/cavalier (and hopefully responsible) among us, that legitimate and essential tools can emerge.
    Bastard child or not.

    We shouldn’t forget that its beneficial to have a legitimate corporate entity, based in a country with one of the oldest legal systems in the world (The U.K.), willing to spend serious capital in the quest for a better system, better tools, and ultimately to bash and coerce this very new concept of ‘Metaverse’ out of this pioneering era of all talk and not much action, and into the refined and reasonable system of rules and boundaries which many of us seem to assume it has already automagically become.

    The main point of all this comes back to the general realisation that it’s not Linden Labs (or any metaverse creator’s) responsibility to police our Intellectual Property.
    It’s the responsibility of persons wanting to protect their I.P.

    Sure, tools can be used to take things that aren’t rightfully the property of those taking them. But until the discovery of that property being misused theres nothing that can be done about it. However in a digital world, assuming we do it right, and unlike in the real world, we have much more chance to be able to easily locate and address such misuse.
    vis: http://www.google.com/alerts/ or http://webi.metaverseink.com …and the ease of communicating globally with your internet neighbours about any possible misuse of our stuff they have seen… as opposed to the ease and probable outcomes making a police report about a stolen car, mugging, or shoplifting incidence.

    Entities making tools often have to knowingly break things outside their immediate control before the rest of us decide to motivate the fixing of what is the inherently broken element in the equation.

  33. I am in Second Life and i have never used a program like Second Inventory or Builderbot.
    I didn’t find any other virtual world whereto i want to export any of my builds.
    Open Grid has even more permission issues then SL. Why would i want to go there?

    If Rezzable wanted to build a tool for creators to back up their stuff, one that would only export your OWN builds and creations i would understand his intention. When my husband’s question was asked to him, if he will release a tool/script to protect our sims from misuse of his Builderbot he sounded like he just swallowed his own sock.

    This is not a tool sold to help creators, this is a tool to harm Second Life and the ones who built this world from scratch: builders/creators.

    QUOTE:
    “Entities making tools often have to knowingly break things outside their immediate control before the rest of us decide to motivate the fixing of what is the inherently broken element in the equation.”
    /QUOTE

    This is not breaking things outside immediate control, this is purposely making lots of noise about a tool that will break things in a way it will be unfixable.

    It’s like throwing loaded guns in a kindergarden and then say this is outside our immediate control.

    Let’s hope Linden Lab refuses to sell Rezzable a license in the first place.

    My and other’s rl lawyers will come in handy soon. I hope RainasRight has enough saved up of what he made on other’s swet because he will pay huge for this.

  34. “In retrospect I’m also a little surprised that there isn’t a standard agreement with this kind of broadcast event where people accept that chatlogs will be collated *with transcription of the voice discussion* for unified publishing.
    “IMO this is essential before those who were not there, or who were there and want to review, can armchair-criticise in forum like this.”

    I’m a little surprised that BETLOG thought this was an official transcript of the chat that emerged after the Designing Worlds show. If we had proposed to make an official transcript, we would have said so, in order for people to judge their responses accordingly.

    I think quite a lot of the views held by the audience were expressed in the show (not only relating to the BuilderBot, but also to the Content Management Roadmap and to the problems with third party viewers such a CryoLife and Emerald). But there was also an open, informal discussion after the show where there was a full and frank exchange of views, only some of which is recorded as it was conducted partially in text but largely in voice.

    We’re certainly hoping to be able to have more shows like this, as it is clear these topics are of great importance to content creators and grid residents. As it was, Treet kept the cameras rolling on what is theoretically meant to be a half-hour show for the best part of an hour so that we could have a chance for audience feedback within the show.

  35. BETLOG Hax says:

    “if he will release a tool/script to protect our sims from misuse of his Builderbot he sounded like he just swallowed his own sock.”

    I interpreted it as him saying he agreed in principle to doing that. But then realized he didn’t want to be promising anything to a hostile audience before he checked with his coders if it was even possible.

  36. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    Betlog is working on Builderbot for RaR.

  37. rightasrain says:

    @admin actaully not my first time on your site, was here awhile to defend false claims before about copyright usage for something.

    If people have questions we are willing to answer if we can. But in general the comments here seem less interested in facts than making insulting noise.

    I had thought that posting chatlogs without permission was against TOS, but I guess you allow violations when it suits you.

  38. Question says:

    @RightasRain – Unfortunately or Fortunately, depending how you look at it, TOS only applies to Linden owned blogs and other tools such as second life. There is no TOS violation in publishing chatlogs outside of the LL purview.

  39. admin says:

    Good lord, did you even read the TOS? You’re a developer.

    This furthers my opinion that you don’t CARE.

  40. admin says:

    I published as much of the shows’ chat log as I had. Not all of it is there, but a lot of the audience reaction is there.

    @Beta: “…and personal attacks from the same people who probably use second inventory,”

    No.

  41. Here’s the problem: Content creators (like myself) are not going to ever, EVER, be protected from content copying. Please see: Mp3s.

    The challenge is coming up with ways to either be so amazing that people will rather pay for it to support you, be cheap enough that it’s better economically than going through the hassle of getting BuilderBot and learning it, OR to just not care and get a day job.

    The days of getting retarded rich in SL are over. It is now hobby income at most.

    I do hope, however, that as soon as this BuilderBot thing is released someone logs into the Rezzable grid and copies everything and pastes it into every single grid out there.

    Karma’s a bitch.

  42. admin says:

    Lordfly, I don’t know if this is anyone complaining about not getting rich – for a lot of people, this is just them losing their art because someone is an asshole.

  43. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    @ lordfly

    Well if RaR didn’t create the content on rezzable, why would u wish that? Isn’t it someone elses art whom RaR took advantage of?

  44. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    What? this RaR guy is forty-something and still acting like a retard… FAIL at running a business that exploits people, FAIL in responsibility, FAIL in ethics, and FAIL in popularity with successful people in SL. If he had any win in him, he might be able to see what he is doing wrong in life and change.

    Maybe he’ll end up being successful at having his own Wikipedia entry just like Eric Baum. At least when SL goes to shit because of Builderbot, there will be plenty of people with extra time on their hands to make ‘tribute’ sites for RightasRain.

  45. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    @byib

    That’s probably what be wants …

  46. Business-In-Your-Box says:

    @Blahblahblahwhatever

    LOL. Everything this guy touches turns to shit dust, have you ever met anyone made of so much FAIL?

  47. Shamrawk says:

    @ RaR

    I watched the vid, and I dont see the benefit of your ‘tool’. I think many agree with this statement. Anyone who would create something that could basically steal whole entire builds should check out of SL for good. Yeah there are copybots out there, but you have to know someone who knows someone to get them, but your ‘builderbot’ is going to be mass marketed, right? Therefore more accessible…and much more damaging to the already weak SL economy.

    I really hope LL says no, and this idea is not made a reality on the grid.

  48. BETLOG Hax says:

    @Business-In-Your-Box
    “Betlog is working on Builderbot for RaR.”

    No, I am not.
    I did some completely unrelated work for Rezzable about a year ago, on more trivial LSL and building/sculpting stuff, but we have since parted ways.
    I have absolutely no reason to push RaR’s nor Rezzables agendas. In fact if I wanted to jump on the rezzable bashing bandwagon I could probably stick a few daggers in too.
    However I’m stating my own opinions. Not so much because I think my opinion is all-important, but because i see a need for some balance in what from every other quarter is starting to look like a pitchfork wielding mob attacking whatever seems convenient, and seemingly overlooking avenues where their energies would be better directed as something other than childish insults and sheer hate.
    ie: constructive dialog with developers (which most of you have probably ruled yourselves out of simply by exhibiting such poor diplomacy/debating skills)
    and addressing the wider issue of feature requests for creator tag and permissions portability between grids.

    Business-In-Your-Box
    You probably should avoid making unequivocal statements that make it seem like you are stating fact about me, as far as i know (given that you are basically an anonymous poster) you don’t know me.
    You probably should also keep in mind, and I say this to you with some respect, that when you post vitriolic anonymous assumptions, it doesn’t help people to want to listen/read what you think. It starts to come across as juvenile anger crazed ranting pretty fast.

    Even if i was working for RaR… I’d still be stating my own opinions.
    Yes really.

  49. “@lordfly Well if RaR didn’t create the content on rezzable, why would u wish that? Isn’t it someone elses art whom RaR took advantage of?”

    RaR probably weaseled all rights from these artists with a poorly worded contract. As in, the artists have lost all rights to those creations anyways. Might as well unleash them elsewhere so people can enjoy the art without giving RaR any attention.

    Or, better yet, using those tools to “steal back” the art RaR took in the first place. That sounds stupid, but it isn’t, really.

  50. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    “poorly worded contract”

    I don’t doubt it. His whole website sounds like an illiterate kid trying tone professional and failing. I laugh everytime I read anything written by him.

    And yes, I’m sure they did ( give him ip rights to their stuff )

  51. Blahblahblahwhatever says:

    To be**

  52. Nobody interesting says:

    After having worked closely with RaR, building sims and so forth, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that he cares not a jot for the content creators that made Rezzable what it is, all he sees is money and how he can profit.

    In short, he’s a scumbag.

  53. Luna Bliss says:

    Releasing this tool is criminal.
    Big corporations can hire lawyers to remedy the copyright infringements that occur from its use, while the average content creator will not have the money to protect their copybotted creations.
    Like I said before, it’s easy to package up a SIM with already existing tools that protect permissions – it only takes a few hours. There is no need to release a tool that will destroy the lives of smaller content creators in SL.

  54. BETLOG Hax says:

    Luna: “it’s easy to package up a SIM with already existing tools that protect permissions – it only takes a few hours.”

    What methods are you referring to?
    Does it let you transfer between grids?
    Does it let you do this all at once to the dozens of individual builders stuff in the sim, some.. er…many of whom completely fail at setting group share much less at setting proper perms, and some of whom have completely vanished into RL or yet another alt? Despite the fact that you may have paid for and own, their work, and therefore really have no reasonable requirement, legal or ethical, to label each prim with its original creators avatar name?
    For several dozen sims or more?

  55. Mr Hax, I would suggest that you need to be very careful with your terminology here, as it goes to the core of many of the problems with Intellectual Property.

    A great many people do not understand the difference between “owning an object” – i.e. having it in your inventory, possibly with full SL perms, and “owning the intellectual property” which would allow you to take it to another grid (which would involve stripping the name of the creator).

    If you own the object but NOT the intellectual property, then you have no legal or moral right to move the object to another place, no matter how long gone the creator is. And that may be tough, but that is the law. There IS a legal requirement to respect Intellectual Property. And for many people, there is a moral requirement too.

    Ethics which we abandon when it inconveniences us are not ethics at all.

    Rezzable state that they have purchased the intellectual property of the objects they are moving with the aid of BuilderBot, and that is fair enough. They say it will benefit other sims in the same condition. That may be true – but I really wonderful how many other sims exist where the sim owners own the Intellectual Property to every last plant or sofa cushion.

    And it is possible – indeed highly probable – that such a tool, sold on the open market, will be purchased by people who do not understand the difference. And it will also be purchased by people who do not care about the difference.

  56. admin says:

    Saffia… I might be in love with you. I hope you’re ok with that.

  57. “They say it will benefit other sims in the same condition. That may be true – but I really wonderful how many other sims exist where the sim owners own the Intellectual Property to every last plant or sofa cushion.
    And it is possible – indeed highly probable – that such a tool, sold on the open market, will be purchased by people who do not understand the difference. And it will also be purchased by people who do not care about the difference.”

    Would this be the tool about which it has been stated for a month or so that the final release will respect owner rights/permissions, the details of which a recent blog post has made very specific? Or is it the version *in somebody’s head*? I find it hard to keep up sometimes.

  58. Yes, in the most recent post Mr Rimbaud has stated that BuilderBot does respect creators’ rights and permissions, and I am delighted.

    Some of my concern stemmed from the fact that – on the Designing Worlds show – Mr Rimbaud said that it was proposed to release the tool next week. As at that point, the stated Rezzable position was: “Assuming that the DRM checks can be added without too much effort or complication, we should be able to add that to the software offering”, I think my concern was understandable.

    In his most recent blog post, he has stressed that when released, these checks will be in place, and that is excellent. Let’s hope that gives guidance to other individuals and organisations working on such back-up tools – and owners of Open Sim grids too.

    But in my post, I did actually say “such a tool”. My concern is not just with BuilderBot but with the potential for tools of a similar nature to over-ride Intellectual Property rights. And another issue raised by Angela Talamasca in the show was the problems inherent in certain browsers.

    I don’t want to indulge in scare tactics – heaven knows that is easy enough to do, and therefore we talked long and hard before we put the show on the air. We look at ways in which things can be made better, not worse. And a key issue is educating the public.

    As I said on one of our IP shows, the situation is in some senses analogous to drink driving. Fifty years ago, no-one saw a problem with driving after a few drinks, providing you were ‘careful’. Indeed, in the UK, the introduction of the breathalyser was greeted with fury – such a gross infringement of rights!

    But over the years, the social attitude has changed. People no longer see it as socially acceptable to drink and drive.

    We need a similar change in attitude to the theft of Intellectual Property rights. And to do that, we need to make it absolutely clear what those rights are. We have to make it abundantly clear what the difference between SL perms and IP rights is – that have permission to copy, modify and transfer does NOT mean you can up and take it to another grid and strip the creator’s name from the object in the process.

    I applaud Rezzable for doing the right thing now. I regret the fact that it took so much effort and pain for so many creators before it became clear what the right thing was.

    And I deplore the fact that so many people still don’t get it … and that we have such a long and hard road ahead of us.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Rezzable: On Builderbot again  [...]

  2. [...] of intellectual property, and the challenges to it – and it proved a lively show, with follow-up reports on Shopping Cart Disco, and lively debates on [...]

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE