Should you have any mature feedback or concerns, I will be inclined to reply. Contrarily, I will disregard.

Edit: Ah, I see. you perceive this is a third party viewer collecting data illegally. "it appears that some of those third party viewers also contain functionality that is being used to copy content without the right to do so, facilitate griefing, enable phishing, collect user data without clear disclosure of such practices".

Wrong.

• This isn't a viewer.
• Data is not collected via Second Life; not directly, as I have mentioned numerous times before, and I am perfecting it. I clearly stated in the notes, "With further research, it’s believed plausible to ban users via IP address. Method will be undisclosed."

Oh and BTW he can't get IP addresses. Period. Unless he is hacking into LLNet and the security system or forcing clients to load web pages without user permission or somehow forcing clients to load media. By all means Go check with Linden Lab before you say I am wrong. Ask Linden Lab if Linden Lab wants this guy logging Linden account IP addresses or resident IP addresses. Ask them.

Why is it the most of the "males" here always hide behind fake names and the women always have the balls to post using their SL names anyway?

Unless you have a better idea….put a sock in it while people try to do something positive, regardless of whether those efforts have some effect or none. I don't recall seeing any revolutionary new technology coming out of the O'toole workshop to help with this problem.

Tekk, keep up the good efforts.

Donation? Who makes these calls? Why isn't a decent penis and HUD a donation? That Linden birthed me as a ken doll down there is just as wrong.

Oh, I am out of the loop, but these aren't the fellows taken in by a years ago corrected flaw in SQL that should of been patched are they?

There's no form of "getting into viewers". It's simply incoming data logged and analyzed. I would tell you more, however, it's very sensitive data. Just know that it's not directly via Second Life and it is not against the terms of service.

Even then, the administrators of this blog has your IP address. There's no harm that can be done with your IP address other than restricting it access, which is exactly what my system does to users that are rightfully banned from the regions owned by the users who utilize the system. Since it is not via Second Life directly, their Terms of Service is not taken into consideration.

As far as the security of Content Protection, the two months I have been innovating the system, has been primarily fail-safes and tight security. More specifically, which is why I located to a dedicated virtual private server, which has no linkage to any other hosts (as average webhosts do). Provided that security, it is more costly.

Colleen, I wish I knew what to do.

And Ann, since so many complain about your posts, I have to say I like them. Don't smile, I don't like them all. You are outspoken and say what you think, there should be more people like you. Keep on posting !

If you have any ideas you think would benefit this system, please send me a notecard in-world with your suggestion.

When I sent that note to Tenshi, I informed her that I was unsure if it was complete and was not quite able to process properly due to lack of sleep.

It's not obtainable through LSL, but through the bot that will be hosted 24/7. "using a 24/7 hosted bot." I apologize for not explaining everything initially, but I will do my best to explain as much as I can here when available.

Please remember that the system is interconnected through the bot, the web-based system, and LSL.

How did you manage that?

"Should have gone on a donation basis only."
hmm… fail?
there is a server that needs to be paid, right? why should anyone in the whole wide world do such a work on a dontaion basis and never know if he/she/it is even able to pay the servers costs?
1000L/month is affordable. no need to complain over that =)

IP addresses of users will not be disclosed to any administrators. They will be solely used to deter avatars from creating alternate accounts to bypass bans to repeat offences (i.e. copybotting). Nor is it a hack in any form. It's simply analyzing incoming data.

I'm not prepared to respond to every attempted troll on this blog, and I am pretty fond of the statistics of how many of you simply come here to troll–however, I will respond to reasonable and respectful concerns.

Attempt to slander or in any way to negate the in-depth work and time I have put into this, as a favor to those whom wish to use it, will be ignored. If you don't want to participate, that's fine. I would suggest a common trolling site that others collaboratively troll alongside you; 4chan.org.

Looks like you will sneek secretly into your visitors viewer to access their IP address. I believe this is against LL TOS. And I don't think this is a good move anyway. What else do you see there ? These are cheap hacker methods and have no class at all. What's next ? Try to switch on your visitors webcam, take a RL snapshot and ban the RL person ?

Linden Lab is rarely banning users logging in via third party viewers. At that, it can easily be avoided.

Furthermore, as you seem to be commonly known as a troll here, I would prefer not to explain anything further to you as you refuse to comprehend reason.

Besides LL is banning people detected logging in with theft viewers anyway.

Lawsuits for a global collaborative banlist is intangible. Residents aren't forced to use this system.

As for the actual monthly fee, I was prepared to establish the system free; Current users of the prototype v1.4 have urged me to make it a subscription-based system. Not only does it repay for diligent work, but also for the dedicated server's monthly hosting fees. The price would be a mere L$1,000. It's not an attempt at any profit at all, simply to sustain the system.

And it is still subject to lawsuits for it's inherent flaw of subjective banning that will result in revenge bans.

Fail.